Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Taking You Back In Time

And when I say back in time, I mean very far back in time! You may very well have childhood memories of this film. I selected it because I hadn't seen it since I was...well, I'm not sure. I can't have been older than four.

The Land Before Time
Original release: November 18, 1988

This film, released by Universal, was directed by a man called Don Bluth, known to many animation aficionados as Disney's main competitor in the 1980's, beating out the latter's movies in the box office for several years straight. It was not until 1989 that Disney finally caught up, with its release of The Little Mermaid. Now, this was the man who directed such greats as An American Tail and Anastasia. You don't mess with Don Bluth.

It is said that Don Bluth's works are a bit grittier and a bit deeper than Disney's...or at least, used to be in that era. He left Disney's studios in 1979, complaining that the features had "lost their charm." I can definitely attest that this movie was no mere sugar-sweet movie only for kids. Would a sugar-sweet movie for kids even dare to show the mother Longneck's wound from the Sharptooth? Would a suger-sweet movie for kids so clearly address stereotypes and racial prejudices? Would it have been able to come up with such a powerful yet simple motif for the mother's spirit: the lone, dew-laden Tree Star?

Oh, that reminds me! I find it truly amazing how much thought went into the dinosaurs' speech. So many things that we think have straightforward names are completely rethought, given even more intuitive names; these beautifully simple names match perfectly with the characters, who are people with absolutely no knowledge of science and scientific terms. Thus an Apatosaurus becomes a Longneck, a Tyrannosaurus a Sharptooth, a mystical leaf a Tree Star, a volcano a Mountain That Burns, an earthquake an Earthshake, the sun the Bright Circle. This language makes the dinosaurs' world all the more simple and mystical.

If you think about it, the world in which the story occurs is more of a fantasy world than a historical one. Aside from the beautiful language, we have all the stylized scenery, mundane objects and places that seem to be characterized nonetheless, and...animals that lived millions of years apart from each other! I have yet to see a decent dinosaur movie that paid attention to the difference between 'Jurassic' and 'Cretaceous'! Get it straight, people. But that's just a minor detail, the kind of thing I get picky about. The slight inconsistencies in chronology do not obstruct the storytelling in any way. Remember: fantasy.

I was thoroughly impressed by the work that went into developing the characters and portraying the complex relationships between them. Cera usually comes off as a stuck-up twit, but there are some moments when you really feel sorry for her. Conversely, Littlefoot is the primary protagonist devoted to following his mother's dying wish—to find the Great Valley—but there are so many times when you want to yell at him, "No, you stubborn idiot! There actually IS a T. rex behind you!" And then we have the neurotic Petrie who's scared of flying, the silent giant Spike, and the happy-go-lucky Ducky. Yep yep yep!

This film, though it has a few strange bits (did they really have to reveal the Great Valley with that old sunbeam-spotlight trick?) and is less saccharine than some other works of animation, is truly a classic that still appeals to young and old. Almost makes you forget the thirteen crappy sequels that it "inspired." Today, the original movie still has all of the charm it used to. Come on, I dare you to watch the following clip and not be hypnotized by its mind-numbingly adorable cuteness.



Mahewa's rating: 3.6/5




Why not check out this film's pages at IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes?

1 comment:

bcope said...

I love reading your take on this movie, which was actually the first movie I ever saw in a theater so it holds a special place in my heart. I actually saw the latter half of the movie last year when I flipping through cable sequestered in a hotel room. It's always odd when you revisit something and consider the impact of your own point of view.

As far as your review, again, concise to the point, conveying the essence of the movie's strengths and weakness. I like how you used the history of the director as a means of introducing the movie. Nice touch. Finally, you might consider being more consistent with your diction. In one sentence you aptly uses the elevated word saccharine and then use the not so elevated crappy in the next sentence.